For this post, we are highlighting the major points we have come across while looking up what political issues we may run into while running the glider mission from the Teledyne Webb facility in iceland to our friends in the canaries
Looking at the possible tracks we may follow while conducting this mission along with the currents that we will be facing, there are a number of countries whos eez(exclusive economic zone) we may enter, including Greenland, Canada, Norway, The United Kingdom, France, Spain. Knowing this it will be very important for us to rehash our friendships we made with a number of these countries we became friends with during the 27 mission. Now one of the major components we have to consider that is stated in the law of the sea that one conducting scientific research by use of an auv if the researcher has a point of contact within that country who can defend what the auv is doing. It is a huge plus for the cause also if the data is made public if it would prove to be useful in any way to any search and rescue efforts that may need to be made. We luck out in the fact that the gliders happen to collect data on the currents which can prove very helpful when it comes to this sort of scenario.
There are many advantages to signing the law of the sea and there has been much debate over whether or not the US should sign it or not. One of the major reasons the US has endorsed and considered signing the Law of the Sea is it's protection over research vessels which would allow for the collection of oceanic and atmospheric data that would prove beneficial for not only science but also for our navy.
There is also a major push for the property rights of knowledge which allow for data that is collected to be shared internationally which will also allow for the right to do the collection of the data everywhere.
Rachel, Connor, Sarah, John, Nilsen